Government Case in Chief Nears Close
In an abbreviated afternoon session, prosecutor Kevin Cassidy called Libby, Mont., resident Melvin Burnett to the stand. Mr. Burnett told the jury how he and his wife had operated a timber milling operation in certain buildings on W.R. Grace’s former Export Plant. He said that he had seen “shiny” vermiculite all over the property, which he had leased from Grace, including large and small bags of the product that were left by Grace (which were sold to Mel and Lerah Parker). His testimony stirred a flurry of objections, with Molloy consistently ruling that testimony about indoor releases was irrelevant and therefore inadmissible.
On cross-examination, Grace attorney Walter Lancaster discussed how several samples taken at Burnett’s mill had shown low fiber concentrations. When given the chance to redirect, Cassidy had Burnett testify that he and his employees had spent a significant portion, “about half,” of their time outside, walking around on ground he had already testified was contaminated.
At the close of Burnett’s testimony, with an almost jovial tone in his voice, Judge Molloy excused the jury until Monday. The attorneys and parties then stuck around to take care of some housekeeping. United States Attorney Kris McLean estimated that the prosecution might have only four more witnesses next week, and should be close to finishing with their evidence. McLean, Cassidy and Grace defense attorney David Bernick then offered their opinions on the exact procedure for tomorrow’s hearing on Robert Locke’s testimony. Court will resume tomorrow at 8:30 a.m. for testimony about whether Locke perjured himself, and the potential admissibility of his testimony.
–Mark Lancaster – posted 5:20 p.m.
Posted: April 16th, 2009 under Law.
Comments
Comment from bruce
Time April 17, 2009 at 9:11 am
I thought it was up to the jury to decide on the charge of conspiracy, Not the judge !!!
Comment from Rocky
Time April 17, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Bruce: At the end of the prosecution’s case, the judge can dismiss any charges for which that he believes the government did not present sufficient evidence (the term is whether they carried the “burden of production”… it’s a much lower standard than the “burden of proof” needed for a conviction). Then any remaining charges go to the jury.
Comment from John Derry
Time April 16, 2009 at 10:44 pm
I’m sorry kids but it looks like it’s over to me.
All too soon the Grace folks will be home enjoying tea and crumpets. The defense team has the prosecutors on the ropes, with the motion filed earlier this month, and Malloy’s remarks,( he see’s no conspiracy) – it doesn’t look good. The prosecutors are no closer to proving conspiracy today than they were on day one. Along with the Ted Stevens reference, ( a few days ago) the prosecutors are getting out while the getting is good .
What are the chances Locke’s testimony wont be stricken? (and days of peoples lives wasted)